Generated evidence · pending editorial review

West Ridge: Limited Business License · 1010 — Business licenses

Limited Business License · 1010 · all other available filters

City source retrieved November 5, 2026 · scan evaluated November 9, 2026 · Review context · not a qualifying candidate

Current dashboard records may have been revised. Analyze is a separate action there. Saved-for-review choices stay in this browser and do not endorse a result.

24-month frequency comparison

Annual-only flag · window-sensitive review context. The two-year comparison does not qualify for the frequency ranking. The annual evidence is retained below, not erased.

October 2022–September 2024
352
October 2024–September 2026
316
Change in monthly mean
-1.5

The two windows each contain 24 complete covered months. The magnitude of the change is 1.11-fold. These are published license records, not a population-adjusted rate. Fixed windows do not establish a breakpoint, remove all seasonal effects or prove a renewal explanation.

12-month comparison · context, not the business ranking

October 2024–September 2025
195
October 2025–September 2026
121
Change in monthly mean
-6.17

This annual comparison crosses the original screening gates. Two-year renewal schedules can put a pulse in one annual window and not the other. Opposing directions or threshold sensitivity can have other explanations; an annual-only label is not proof of a renewal cycle.

Saved observations and fitted phases

No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant.

Fixed six-log-cycle frame · 120 calendar months · factors per six months. Raw zeros stay zero; confirmed zeros become one only for log-space fitting and diagnostics. Missing coverage remains unavailable.

Monthly business license records on a standard celeration chartCity of Chicago published records. Fixed six-decade count scale, 120 calendar months, celeration per 6 months. Zero markers are unconnected below the plot. Exact counts and coverage are available in the data table. Analyze: suggested. No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant. See the phase results table for dates, factors and uncertainty.1510501005001,0005,00010,00050,000100,000500,0001,000,000License records per monthsuggested phase 1: 2016-10–2026-09Oct 2016: 17Nov 2016: 9Dec 2016: 7Jan 2017: 16Feb 2017: 163Mar 2017: 12Apr 2017: 11May 2017: 21Jun 2017: 12Jul 2017: 10Aug 2017: 18Sep 2017: 7Oct 2017: 66Nov 2017: 12Dec 2017: 5Jan 2018: 10Feb 2018: 9Mar 2018: 12Apr 2018: 8May 2018: 11Jun 2018: 7Jul 2018: 9Aug 2018: 10Sep 2018: 7Oct 2018: 17Nov 2018: 8Dec 2018: 8Jan 2019: 11Feb 2019: 127Mar 2019: 14Apr 2019: 12May 2019: 12Jun 2019: 13Jul 2019: 9Aug 2019: 15Sep 2019: 13Oct 2019: 60Nov 2019: 10Dec 2019: 7Jan 2020: 13Feb 2020: 12Mar 2020: 6Apr 2020: 4May 2020: 11Jun 2020: 11Jul 2020: 7Aug 2020: 10Sep 2020: 9Oct 2020: 16Nov 2020: 4Dec 2020: 10Jan 2021: 10Feb 2021: 102Mar 2021: 10Apr 2021: 8May 2021: 12Jun 2021: 13Jul 2021: 7Aug 2021: 12Sep 2021: 16Oct 2021: 49Nov 2021: 13Dec 2021: 11Jan 2022: 10Feb 2022: 12Mar 2022: 15Apr 2022: 6May 2022: 10Jun 2022: 8Jul 2022: 4Aug 2022: 5Sep 2022: 9Oct 2022: 16Nov 2022: 6Dec 2022: 3Jan 2023: 12Feb 2023: 93Mar 2023: 10Apr 2023: 6May 2023: 13Jun 2023: 19Jul 2023: 10Aug 2023: 16Sep 2023: 15Oct 2023: 41Nov 2023: 10Dec 2023: 10Jan 2024: 7Feb 2024: 13Mar 2024: 10Apr 2024: 10May 2024: 10Jun 2024: 3Jul 2024: 7Aug 2024: 6Sep 2024: 6Oct 2024: 12Nov 2024: 9Dec 2024: 5Jan 2025: 8Feb 2025: 79Mar 2025: 11Apr 2025: 9May 2025: 14Jun 2025: 12Jul 2025: 11Aug 2025: 11Sep 2025: 14Oct 2025: 29Nov 2025: 13Dec 2025: 12Jan 2026: 5Feb 2026: 10Mar 2026: 9Apr 2026: 3May 2026: 11Jun 2026: 5Jul 2026: 6Aug 2026: 7Sep 2026: 11ZeroUnknownOct 2016Oct 2017Oct 2018Oct 2019Oct 2020Oct 2021Oct 2022Oct 2023Oct 2024Oct 2025Oct 2026Calendar months

Suggested trend · exploratory · per six months

  1. 1 · Oct 2016–Sep 2026÷1.02Direction uncertain

Check the evidence

Interpretation and limitations (12)
  • Exploratory description, not a forecast, causal explanation or proof of a change.
  • Approximate 95% factor intervals assume independent, constant-variance log residuals and fixed boundaries. They do not account for boundary search, serial dependence or source revisions.
  • Confirmed zeros are treated as 1 only for fitting and its diagnostics. Raw counts stay zero; low-count results depend on this convention.
  • Independent phase lines may jump at boundaries. Every observation belongs to exactly one phase.
  • Reporting, classifications and seasonality can change. Counts are not population-adjusted; a level shift without a slope change is not the target of this search.
  • Uses dated last-good cached data, not newly verified source counts.
  • At least one factor interval includes 1; its direction is uncertain under this approximation.
  • License records include renewals and use license-term dates. Category/ward changes and administrative practice can affect counts; these are not business openings, closures or employment.
  • Business frequency screening compares adjacent 24-month windows, requiring 48 complete months. The 12-month comparison is context only. Fixed two-year windows reduce renewal-calendar mismatch; they are not seasonal adjustment, proof of a renewal mechanism, or a test of stability.
  • Window assessment: annual-only. Annual-only flags do not enter the frequency ranking. Opposite directions and short history must not be described as persistent changes.
  • Many dependent filter conditions were searched. No multiple-testing-adjusted significance or causal attribution is claimed.
  • Frequency compares fixed equal-length windows of raw counts, not population risk or a celeration-factor ratio. Reporting, classifications and exposure may have changed.
Phase diagnostics

Intervals assume fixed boundaries and independent log residuals. They are not adjusted for the phase or filter search. Near-optimal boundary ranges are not confidence intervals.

Saved phase results
PhaseStart–endMonthsFactor / six monthsConditional 95% intervalZeros fitted as 1Lag-one residual
1October 2016–September 2026120÷1.020.9584–1.00200.074
Exact monthly observations (120 slots)

Newest first. Unknown coverage is not a zero. These are the original saved observations, not fitted or rounded predictions.

Raw monthly license records
MonthRaw countCoverage
September 202611complete
August 20267complete
July 20266complete
June 20265complete
May 202611complete
April 20263complete
March 20269complete
February 202610complete
January 20265complete
December 202512complete
November 202513complete
October 202529complete
September 202514complete
August 202511complete
July 202511complete
June 202512complete
May 202514complete
April 20259complete
March 202511complete
February 202579complete
January 20258complete
December 20245complete
November 20249complete
October 202412complete
September 20246complete
August 20246complete
July 20247complete
June 20243complete
May 202410complete
April 202410complete
March 202410complete
February 202413complete
January 20247complete
December 202310complete
November 202310complete
October 202341complete
September 202315complete
August 202316complete
July 202310complete
June 202319complete
May 202313complete
April 20236complete
March 202310complete
February 202393complete
January 202312complete
December 20223complete
November 20226complete
October 202216complete
September 20229complete
August 20225complete
July 20224complete
June 20228complete
May 202210complete
April 20226complete
March 202215complete
February 202212complete
January 202210complete
December 202111complete
November 202113complete
October 202149complete
September 202116complete
August 202112complete
July 20217complete
June 202113complete
May 202112complete
April 20218complete
March 202110complete
February 2021102complete
January 202110complete
December 202010complete
November 20204complete
October 202016complete
September 20209complete
August 202010complete
July 20207complete
June 202011complete
May 202011complete
April 20204complete
March 20206complete
February 202012complete
January 202013complete
December 20197complete
November 201910complete
October 201960complete
September 201913complete
August 201915complete
July 20199complete
June 201913complete
May 201912complete
April 201912complete
March 201914complete
February 2019127complete
January 201911complete
December 20188complete
November 20188complete
October 201817complete
September 20187complete
August 201810complete
July 20189complete
June 20187complete
May 201811complete
April 20188complete
March 201812complete
February 20189complete
January 201810complete
December 20175complete
November 201712complete
October 201766complete
September 20177complete
August 201718complete
July 201710complete
June 201712complete
May 201721complete
April 201711complete
March 201712complete
February 2017163complete
January 201716complete
December 20167complete
November 20169complete
October 201617complete
Source and reproducibility
Publisher dataset
Business Licenses · City of Chicago
Source retrieved
2026-11-05T21:09:58.696Z
Publisher update
2026-11-05T11:01:01.000Z
Covered months
October 2016–September 2026
Source note
Source xqx5-8hwx. Joint day/category/hour/applicable-flag/ward/status counts; no addresses, coordinates or incident identifiers. Each year's cells reconcile with an independent source total. Reads are not an atomic publisher snapshot. License records by term start, including renewals; not new businesses. Ward is as published, not reconstructed historical boundaries. Prepared daily community-area snapshot; scheduled rebuild at 06:00 America/Chicago. Full supported history is rechecked for corrections. Retrieval timestamps are preserved; this is not a real-time feed. Local indexed neighborhood snapshot. Totals are for the loaded area before other filters, not citywide totals. Citywide and unassigned-area views use a separate network-backed scope.
Snapshot
daily-v1:8a9771a7-dde2-4246-9cf6-d11519e895d6:neighborhood-v2:0d6aaaad72f700e09f9f6173e4f7fb31
Discovery method
multi-feed-turn-and-frequency-renewal-v2
Analyze method
exploratory-segmented-log10-ols-zero-as-one-v3
Search plan
a3ffccedeb8d8ce18a30df3636839f775af1e5188e55a1f685695133135c6e35
Evidence run
2e1a9453ce5be612b625d36baf0b97cc9da5da9f744f6798928c4646777c9869

Challenge the pattern

Check unfiltered totals, comparable communities, source revisions and administrative definitions before treating this candidate as evidence of a real-world explanation. Only explicitly documented follow-ups above have been performed; no others are implied by the ranking. Browse the other business licenses candidates or review the complete screening method.