Generated evidence · pending editorial review

McKinley Park: All categories · Ward: 12 — Business licenses

All categories · Ward: 12

City source retrieved November 5, 2026 · scan evaluated November 9, 2026 · Review context · not a qualifying candidate

Current dashboard records may have been revised. Analyze is a separate action there. Saved-for-review choices stay in this browser and do not endorse a result.

24-month frequency comparison

Annual-only flag · window-sensitive review context. The two-year comparison does not qualify for the frequency ranking. The annual evidence is retained below, not erased.

October 2022–September 2024
207
October 2024–September 2026
205
Change in monthly mean
-0.08

The two windows each contain 24 complete covered months. The magnitude of the change is 1.01-fold. These are published license records, not a population-adjusted rate. Fixed windows do not establish a breakpoint, remove all seasonal effects or prove a renewal explanation.

12-month comparison · context, not the business ranking

October 2024–September 2025
71
October 2025–September 2026
134
Change in monthly mean
5.25

This annual comparison crosses the original screening gates. Two-year renewal schedules can put a pulse in one annual window and not the other. Opposing directions or threshold sensitivity can have other explanations; an annual-only label is not proof of a renewal cycle.

Saved observations and fitted phases

No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant.

Fixed six-log-cycle frame · 120 calendar months · factors per six months. Raw zeros stay zero; confirmed zeros become one only for log-space fitting and diagnostics. Missing coverage remains unavailable.

Monthly business license records on a standard celeration chartCity of Chicago published records. Fixed six-decade count scale, 120 calendar months, celeration per 6 months. Zero markers are unconnected below the plot. Exact counts and coverage are available in the data table. Analyze: suggested. No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant. See the phase results table for dates, factors and uncertainty.1510501005001,0005,00010,00050,000100,000500,0001,000,000License records per monthsuggested phase 1: 2016-10–2026-09Oct 2016: 2Nov 2016: 5Dec 2016: 2Jan 2017: 6Feb 2017: 4Mar 2017: 11Apr 2017: 10May 2017: 6Jun 2017: 6Jul 2017: 5Aug 2017: 5Sep 2017: 9Oct 2017: 2Nov 2017: 6Dec 2017: 50Jan 2018: 36Feb 2018: 12Mar 2018: 6Apr 2018: 4May 2018: 9Jun 2018: 3Jul 2018: 7Aug 2018: 5Sep 2018: 7Oct 2018: 3Nov 2018: 4Dec 2018: 3Jan 2019: 5Feb 2019: 3Mar 2019: 9Apr 2019: 5May 2019: 5Jun 2019: 5Jul 2019: 9Aug 2019: 5Sep 2019: 10Oct 2019: 2Nov 2019: 7Dec 2019: 42Jan 2020: 32Feb 2020: 10Mar 2020: 8Apr 2020: 1May 2020: 7Jun 2020: 3Jul 2020: 6Aug 2020: 3Sep 2020: 6Oct 2020: 4Nov 2020: 4Dec 2020: 6Jan 2021: 6Feb 2021: 4Mar 2021: 10Apr 2021: 5May 2021: 6Jun 2021: 8Jul 2021: 4Aug 2021: 5Sep 2021: 7Oct 2021: 3Nov 2021: 9Dec 2021: 37Jan 2022: 27Feb 2022: 13Mar 2022: 10Apr 2022: 2May 2022: 10Jun 2022: 5Jul 2022: 9Aug 2022: 6Sep 2022: 6Oct 2022: 4Nov 2022: 5Dec 2022: 6Jan 2023: 6Feb 2023: 6Mar 2023: 9Apr 2023: 7May 2023: 7Jun 2023: 7Jul 2023: 3Aug 2023: 4Sep 2023: 7Oct 2023: 3Nov 2023: 6Dec 2023: 33Jan 2024: 24Feb 2024: 12Mar 2024: 11Apr 2024: 4May 2024: 11Jun 2024: 4Jul 2024: 11Aug 2024: 5Sep 2024: 12Oct 2024: 5Nov 2024: 5Dec 2024: 6Jan 2025: 5Feb 2025: 8Mar 2025: 8Apr 2025: 7May 2025: 10Jun 2025: 4Jul 2025: 2Aug 2025: 3Sep 2025: 8Oct 2025: 2Nov 2025: 11Dec 2025: 32Jan 2026: 19Feb 2026: 12Mar 2026: 9Apr 2026: 6May 2026: 11Jun 2026: 9Jul 2026: 9Aug 2026: 4Sep 2026: 10ZeroUnknownOct 2016Oct 2017Oct 2018Oct 2019Oct 2020Oct 2021Oct 2022Oct 2023Oct 2024Oct 2025Oct 2026Calendar months

Suggested trend · exploratory · per six months

  1. 1 · Oct 2016–Sep 2026×1.02Direction uncertain

Check the evidence

Interpretation and limitations (12)
  • Exploratory description, not a forecast, causal explanation or proof of a change.
  • Approximate 95% factor intervals assume independent, constant-variance log residuals and fixed boundaries. They do not account for boundary search, serial dependence or source revisions.
  • Confirmed zeros are treated as 1 only for fitting and its diagnostics. Raw counts stay zero; low-count results depend on this convention.
  • Independent phase lines may jump at boundaries. Every observation belongs to exactly one phase.
  • Reporting, classifications and seasonality can change. Counts are not population-adjusted; a level shift without a slope change is not the target of this search.
  • Uses dated last-good cached data, not newly verified source counts.
  • At least one factor interval includes 1; its direction is uncertain under this approximation.
  • License records include renewals and use license-term dates. Category/ward changes and administrative practice can affect counts; these are not business openings, closures or employment.
  • Business frequency screening compares adjacent 24-month windows, requiring 48 complete months. The 12-month comparison is context only. Fixed two-year windows reduce renewal-calendar mismatch; they are not seasonal adjustment, proof of a renewal mechanism, or a test of stability.
  • Window assessment: annual-only. Annual-only flags do not enter the frequency ranking. Opposite directions and short history must not be described as persistent changes.
  • Many dependent filter conditions were searched. No multiple-testing-adjusted significance or causal attribution is claimed.
  • Frequency compares fixed equal-length windows of raw counts, not population risk or a celeration-factor ratio. Reporting, classifications and exposure may have changed.
Phase diagnostics

Intervals assume fixed boundaries and independent log residuals. They are not adjusted for the phase or filter search. Near-optimal boundary ranges are not confidence intervals.

Saved phase results
PhaseStart–endMonthsFactor / six monthsConditional 95% intervalZeros fitted as 1Lag-one residual
1October 2016–September 2026120×1.020.9939–1.03900.283
Exact monthly observations (120 slots)

Newest first. Unknown coverage is not a zero. These are the original saved observations, not fitted or rounded predictions.

Raw monthly license records
MonthRaw countCoverage
September 202610complete
August 20264complete
July 20269complete
June 20269complete
May 202611complete
April 20266complete
March 20269complete
February 202612complete
January 202619complete
December 202532complete
November 202511complete
October 20252complete
September 20258complete
August 20253complete
July 20252complete
June 20254complete
May 202510complete
April 20257complete
March 20258complete
February 20258complete
January 20255complete
December 20246complete
November 20245complete
October 20245complete
September 202412complete
August 20245complete
July 202411complete
June 20244complete
May 202411complete
April 20244complete
March 202411complete
February 202412complete
January 202424complete
December 202333complete
November 20236complete
October 20233complete
September 20237complete
August 20234complete
July 20233complete
June 20237complete
May 20237complete
April 20237complete
March 20239complete
February 20236complete
January 20236complete
December 20226complete
November 20225complete
October 20224complete
September 20226complete
August 20226complete
July 20229complete
June 20225complete
May 202210complete
April 20222complete
March 202210complete
February 202213complete
January 202227complete
December 202137complete
November 20219complete
October 20213complete
September 20217complete
August 20215complete
July 20214complete
June 20218complete
May 20216complete
April 20215complete
March 202110complete
February 20214complete
January 20216complete
December 20206complete
November 20204complete
October 20204complete
September 20206complete
August 20203complete
July 20206complete
June 20203complete
May 20207complete
April 20201complete
March 20208complete
February 202010complete
January 202032complete
December 201942complete
November 20197complete
October 20192complete
September 201910complete
August 20195complete
July 20199complete
June 20195complete
May 20195complete
April 20195complete
March 20199complete
February 20193complete
January 20195complete
December 20183complete
November 20184complete
October 20183complete
September 20187complete
August 20185complete
July 20187complete
June 20183complete
May 20189complete
April 20184complete
March 20186complete
February 201812complete
January 201836complete
December 201750complete
November 20176complete
October 20172complete
September 20179complete
August 20175complete
July 20175complete
June 20176complete
May 20176complete
April 201710complete
March 201711complete
February 20174complete
January 20176complete
December 20162complete
November 20165complete
October 20162complete
Source and reproducibility
Publisher dataset
Business Licenses · City of Chicago
Source retrieved
2026-11-05T21:09:58.696Z
Publisher update
2026-11-05T11:01:01.000Z
Covered months
October 2016–September 2026
Source note
Source xqx5-8hwx. Joint day/category/hour/applicable-flag/ward/status counts; no addresses, coordinates or incident identifiers. Each year's cells reconcile with an independent source total. Reads are not an atomic publisher snapshot. License records by term start, including renewals; not new businesses. Ward is as published, not reconstructed historical boundaries. Prepared daily community-area snapshot; scheduled rebuild at 06:00 America/Chicago. Full supported history is rechecked for corrections. Retrieval timestamps are preserved; this is not a real-time feed. Local indexed neighborhood snapshot. Totals are for the loaded area before other filters, not citywide totals. Citywide and unassigned-area views use a separate network-backed scope.
Snapshot
daily-v1:8a9771a7-dde2-4246-9cf6-d11519e895d6:neighborhood-v2:3753de4e513cd6a03da8bfb07cde7798
Discovery method
multi-feed-turn-and-frequency-renewal-v2
Analyze method
exploratory-segmented-log10-ols-zero-as-one-v3
Search plan
a3ffccedeb8d8ce18a30df3636839f775af1e5188e55a1f685695133135c6e35
Evidence run
fdda7c7bbbeaa083e996ff1448269ebdf49d339f6a43e9dfa5151f208f4147c7

Challenge the pattern

Check unfiltered totals, comparable communities, source revisions and administrative definitions before treating this candidate as evidence of a real-world explanation. Only explicitly documented follow-ups above have been performed; no others are implied by the ranking. Browse the other business licenses candidates or review the complete screening method.