Generated evidence · pending editorial review

Lake View: All categories · Ward: 32 — Business licenses

All categories · Ward: 32

City source retrieved November 5, 2026 · scan evaluated November 9, 2026 · Review context · not a qualifying candidate

Current dashboard records may have been revised. Analyze is a separate action there. Saved-for-review choices stay in this browser and do not endorse a result.

24-month frequency comparison

Annual-only flag · window-sensitive review context. The two-year comparison does not qualify for the frequency ranking. The annual evidence is retained below, not erased.

October 2022–September 2024
415
October 2024–September 2026
355
Change in monthly mean
-2.5

The two windows each contain 24 complete covered months. The magnitude of the change is 1.17-fold. These are published license records, not a population-adjusted rate. Fixed windows do not establish a breakpoint, remove all seasonal effects or prove a renewal explanation.

12-month comparison · context, not the business ranking

October 2024–September 2025
216
October 2025–September 2026
139
Change in monthly mean
-6.42

This annual comparison crosses the original screening gates. Two-year renewal schedules can put a pulse in one annual window and not the other. Opposing directions or threshold sensitivity can have other explanations; an annual-only label is not proof of a renewal cycle.

Saved observations and fitted phases

No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant.

Fixed six-log-cycle frame · 120 calendar months · factors per six months. Raw zeros stay zero; confirmed zeros become one only for log-space fitting and diagnostics. Missing coverage remains unavailable.

Monthly business license records on a standard celeration chartCity of Chicago published records. Fixed six-decade count scale, 120 calendar months, celeration per 6 months. Zero markers are unconnected below the plot. Exact counts and coverage are available in the data table. Analyze: suggested. No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant. See the phase results table for dates, factors and uncertainty.1510501005001,0005,00010,00050,000100,000500,0001,000,000License records per monthsuggested phase 1: 2016-10–2026-09Oct 2016: 10Nov 2016: 9Dec 2016: 11Jan 2017: 7Feb 2017: 160Mar 2017: 14Apr 2017: 17May 2017: 19Jun 2017: 13Jul 2017: 11Aug 2017: 17Sep 2017: 12Oct 2017: 19Nov 2017: 29Dec 2017: 9Jan 2018: 5Feb 2018: 14Mar 2018: 10Apr 2018: 14May 2018: 19Jun 2018: 14Jul 2018: 14Aug 2018: 14Sep 2018: 13Oct 2018: 16Nov 2018: 7Dec 2018: 12Jan 2019: 6Feb 2019: 130Mar 2019: 12Apr 2019: 16May 2019: 16Jun 2019: 10Jul 2019: 9Aug 2019: 14Sep 2019: 9Oct 2019: 8Nov 2019: 22Dec 2019: 10Jan 2020: 1Feb 2020: 15Mar 2020: 12Apr 2020: 10May 2020: 12Jun 2020: 12Jul 2020: 9Aug 2020: 12Sep 2020: 3Oct 2020: 9Nov 2020: 8Dec 2020: 13Jan 2021: 10Feb 2021: 113Mar 2021: 11Apr 2021: 16May 2021: 14Jun 2021: 11Jul 2021: 13Aug 2021: 23Sep 2021: 15Oct 2021: 13Nov 2021: 23Dec 2021: 13Jan 2022: 4Feb 2022: 17Mar 2022: 11Apr 2022: 13May 2022: 13Jun 2022: 10Jul 2022: 9Aug 2022: 21Sep 2022: 6Oct 2022: 14Nov 2022: 8Dec 2022: 12Jan 2023: 17Feb 2023: 100Mar 2023: 14Apr 2023: 18May 2023: 16Jun 2023: 12Jul 2023: 13Aug 2023: 19Sep 2023: 14Oct 2023: 8Nov 2023: 25Dec 2023: 11Jan 2024: 5Feb 2024: 10Mar 2024: 17Apr 2024: 15May 2024: 10Jun 2024: 15Jul 2024: 12Aug 2024: 18Sep 2024: 12Oct 2024: 19Nov 2024: 12Dec 2024: 13Jan 2025: 13Feb 2025: 84Mar 2025: 14Apr 2025: 12May 2025: 8Jun 2025: 12Jul 2025: 8Aug 2025: 12Sep 2025: 9Oct 2025: 10Nov 2025: 20Dec 2025: 9Jan 2026: 3Feb 2026: 10Mar 2026: 17Apr 2026: 12May 2026: 11Jun 2026: 9Jul 2026: 12Aug 2026: 15Sep 2026: 11ZeroUnknownOct 2016Oct 2017Oct 2018Oct 2019Oct 2020Oct 2021Oct 2022Oct 2023Oct 2024Oct 2025Oct 2026Calendar months

Suggested trend · exploratory · per six months

  1. 1 · Oct 2016–Sep 2026÷1.01Direction uncertain

Check the evidence

Interpretation and limitations (12)
  • Exploratory description, not a forecast, causal explanation or proof of a change.
  • Approximate 95% factor intervals assume independent, constant-variance log residuals and fixed boundaries. They do not account for boundary search, serial dependence or source revisions.
  • Confirmed zeros are treated as 1 only for fitting and its diagnostics. Raw counts stay zero; low-count results depend on this convention.
  • Independent phase lines may jump at boundaries. Every observation belongs to exactly one phase.
  • Reporting, classifications and seasonality can change. Counts are not population-adjusted; a level shift without a slope change is not the target of this search.
  • Uses dated last-good cached data, not newly verified source counts.
  • At least one factor interval includes 1; its direction is uncertain under this approximation.
  • License records include renewals and use license-term dates. Category/ward changes and administrative practice can affect counts; these are not business openings, closures or employment.
  • Business frequency screening compares adjacent 24-month windows, requiring 48 complete months. The 12-month comparison is context only. Fixed two-year windows reduce renewal-calendar mismatch; they are not seasonal adjustment, proof of a renewal mechanism, or a test of stability.
  • Window assessment: annual-only. Annual-only flags do not enter the frequency ranking. Opposite directions and short history must not be described as persistent changes.
  • Many dependent filter conditions were searched. No multiple-testing-adjusted significance or causal attribution is claimed.
  • Frequency compares fixed equal-length windows of raw counts, not population risk or a celeration-factor ratio. Reporting, classifications and exposure may have changed.
Phase diagnostics

Intervals assume fixed boundaries and independent log residuals. They are not adjusted for the phase or filter search. Near-optimal boundary ranges are not confidence intervals.

Saved phase results
PhaseStart–endMonthsFactor / six monthsConditional 95% intervalZeros fitted as 1Lag-one residual
1October 2016–September 2026120÷1.010.9742–1.0150-0.043
Exact monthly observations (120 slots)

Newest first. Unknown coverage is not a zero. These are the original saved observations, not fitted or rounded predictions.

Raw monthly license records
MonthRaw countCoverage
September 202611complete
August 202615complete
July 202612complete
June 20269complete
May 202611complete
April 202612complete
March 202617complete
February 202610complete
January 20263complete
December 20259complete
November 202520complete
October 202510complete
September 20259complete
August 202512complete
July 20258complete
June 202512complete
May 20258complete
April 202512complete
March 202514complete
February 202584complete
January 202513complete
December 202413complete
November 202412complete
October 202419complete
September 202412complete
August 202418complete
July 202412complete
June 202415complete
May 202410complete
April 202415complete
March 202417complete
February 202410complete
January 20245complete
December 202311complete
November 202325complete
October 20238complete
September 202314complete
August 202319complete
July 202313complete
June 202312complete
May 202316complete
April 202318complete
March 202314complete
February 2023100complete
January 202317complete
December 202212complete
November 20228complete
October 202214complete
September 20226complete
August 202221complete
July 20229complete
June 202210complete
May 202213complete
April 202213complete
March 202211complete
February 202217complete
January 20224complete
December 202113complete
November 202123complete
October 202113complete
September 202115complete
August 202123complete
July 202113complete
June 202111complete
May 202114complete
April 202116complete
March 202111complete
February 2021113complete
January 202110complete
December 202013complete
November 20208complete
October 20209complete
September 20203complete
August 202012complete
July 20209complete
June 202012complete
May 202012complete
April 202010complete
March 202012complete
February 202015complete
January 20201complete
December 201910complete
November 201922complete
October 20198complete
September 20199complete
August 201914complete
July 20199complete
June 201910complete
May 201916complete
April 201916complete
March 201912complete
February 2019130complete
January 20196complete
December 201812complete
November 20187complete
October 201816complete
September 201813complete
August 201814complete
July 201814complete
June 201814complete
May 201819complete
April 201814complete
March 201810complete
February 201814complete
January 20185complete
December 20179complete
November 201729complete
October 201719complete
September 201712complete
August 201717complete
July 201711complete
June 201713complete
May 201719complete
April 201717complete
March 201714complete
February 2017160complete
January 20177complete
December 201611complete
November 20169complete
October 201610complete
Source and reproducibility
Publisher dataset
Business Licenses · City of Chicago
Source retrieved
2026-11-05T21:09:58.696Z
Publisher update
2026-11-05T11:01:01.000Z
Covered months
October 2016–September 2026
Source note
Source xqx5-8hwx. Joint day/category/hour/applicable-flag/ward/status counts; no addresses, coordinates or incident identifiers. Each year's cells reconcile with an independent source total. Reads are not an atomic publisher snapshot. License records by term start, including renewals; not new businesses. Ward is as published, not reconstructed historical boundaries. Prepared daily community-area snapshot; scheduled rebuild at 06:00 America/Chicago. Full supported history is rechecked for corrections. Retrieval timestamps are preserved; this is not a real-time feed. Local indexed neighborhood snapshot. Totals are for the loaded area before other filters, not citywide totals. Citywide and unassigned-area views use a separate network-backed scope.
Snapshot
daily-v1:8a9771a7-dde2-4246-9cf6-d11519e895d6:neighborhood-v2:00bc95adeab9411b0de0889ed3ee2453
Discovery method
multi-feed-turn-and-frequency-renewal-v2
Analyze method
exploratory-segmented-log10-ols-zero-as-one-v3
Search plan
a3ffccedeb8d8ce18a30df3636839f775af1e5188e55a1f685695133135c6e35
Evidence run
518f3924683a4d8de8b789fb809b076d70bf653f8872fba1204e4028f20e0bb6

Challenge the pattern

Check unfiltered totals, comparable communities, source revisions and administrative definitions before treating this candidate as evidence of a real-world explanation. Only explicitly documented follow-ups above have been performed; no others are implied by the ranking. Browse the other business licenses candidates or review the complete screening method.