Generated evidence · pending editorial review

Irving Park: Limited Business License · 1010 — Business licenses

Limited Business License · 1010 · all other available filters

City source retrieved November 5, 2026 · scan evaluated November 9, 2026 · Review context · not a qualifying candidate

Current dashboard records may have been revised. Analyze is a separate action there. Saved-for-review choices stay in this browser and do not endorse a result.

24-month frequency comparison

Annual-only flag · window-sensitive review context. The two-year comparison does not qualify for the frequency ranking. The annual evidence is retained below, not erased.

October 2022–September 2024
281
October 2024–September 2026
269
Change in monthly mean
-0.5

The two windows each contain 24 complete covered months. The magnitude of the change is 1.04-fold. These are published license records, not a population-adjusted rate. Fixed windows do not establish a breakpoint, remove all seasonal effects or prove a renewal explanation.

12-month comparison · context, not the business ranking

October 2024–September 2025
176
October 2025–September 2026
93
Change in monthly mean
-6.92

This annual comparison crosses the original screening gates. Two-year renewal schedules can put a pulse in one annual window and not the other. Opposing directions or threshold sensitivity can have other explanations; an annual-only label is not proof of a renewal cycle.

Saved observations and fitted phases

No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant.

Fixed six-log-cycle frame · 120 calendar months · factors per six months. Raw zeros stay zero; confirmed zeros become one only for log-space fitting and diagnostics. Missing coverage remains unavailable.

Monthly business license records on a standard celeration chartCity of Chicago published records. Fixed six-decade count scale, 120 calendar months, celeration per 6 months. Zero markers are unconnected below the plot. Exact counts and coverage are available in the data table. Analyze: suggested. No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant. See the phase results table for dates, factors and uncertainty.1510501005001,0005,00010,00050,000100,000500,0001,000,000License records per monthsuggested phase 1: 2016-10–2026-09Oct 2016: 7Nov 2016: 14Dec 2016: 82Jan 2017: 24Feb 2017: 11Mar 2017: 12Apr 2017: 14May 2017: 16Jun 2017: 13Jul 2017: 12Aug 2017: 76Sep 2017: 7Oct 2017: 15Nov 2017: 12Dec 2017: 19Jan 2018: 6Feb 2018: 7Mar 2018: 14Apr 2018: 7May 2018: 8Jun 2018: 4Jul 2018: 6Aug 2018: 8Sep 2018: 10Oct 2018: 10Nov 2018: 13Dec 2018: 64Jan 2019: 19Feb 2019: 9Mar 2019: 12Apr 2019: 13May 2019: 12Jun 2019: 10Jul 2019: 13Aug 2019: 46Sep 2019: 8Oct 2019: 12Nov 2019: 13Dec 2019: 16Jan 2020: 8Feb 2020: 7Mar 2020: 11Apr 2020: 4May 2020: 9Jun 2020: 5Jul 2020: 7Aug 2020: 3Sep 2020: 6Oct 2020: 8Nov 2020: 15Dec 2020: 56Jan 2021: 17Feb 2021: 4Mar 2021: 10Apr 2021: 13May 2021: 9Jun 2021: 11Jul 2021: 17Aug 2021: 40Sep 2021: 9Oct 2021: 14Nov 2021: 14Dec 2021: 15Jan 2022: 7Feb 2022: 7Mar 2022: 11Apr 2022: 6May 2022: 7Jun 2022: 8Jul 2022: 6Aug 2022: 4Sep 2022: 9Oct 2022: 8Nov 2022: 14Dec 2022: 43Jan 2023: 15Feb 2023: 6Mar 2023: 9Apr 2023: 11May 2023: 9Jun 2023: 10Jul 2023: 12Aug 2023: 41Sep 2023: 11Oct 2023: 17Nov 2023: 9Dec 2023: 12Jan 2024: 6Feb 2024: 7Mar 2024: 7Apr 2024: 5May 2024: 6Jun 2024: 7Jul 2024: 6Aug 2024: 3Sep 2024: 7Oct 2024: 10Nov 2024: 12Dec 2024: 41Jan 2025: 16Feb 2025: 6Mar 2025: 8Apr 2025: 13May 2025: 8Jun 2025: 12Jul 2025: 11Aug 2025: 32Sep 2025: 7Oct 2025: 10Nov 2025: 13Dec 2025: 13Jan 2026: 8Feb 2026: 6Mar 2026: 4Apr 2026: 6May 2026: 5Jun 2026: 9Jul 2026: 5Aug 2026: 5Sep 2026: 9ZeroUnknownOct 2016Oct 2017Oct 2018Oct 2019Oct 2020Oct 2021Oct 2022Oct 2023Oct 2024Oct 2025Oct 2026Calendar months

Suggested trend · exploratory · per six months

  1. 1 · Oct 2016–Sep 2026÷1.03Fitted decrease

Check the evidence

Interpretation and limitations (11)
  • Exploratory description, not a forecast, causal explanation or proof of a change.
  • Approximate 95% factor intervals assume independent, constant-variance log residuals and fixed boundaries. They do not account for boundary search, serial dependence or source revisions.
  • Confirmed zeros are treated as 1 only for fitting and its diagnostics. Raw counts stay zero; low-count results depend on this convention.
  • Independent phase lines may jump at boundaries. Every observation belongs to exactly one phase.
  • Reporting, classifications and seasonality can change. Counts are not population-adjusted; a level shift without a slope change is not the target of this search.
  • Uses dated last-good cached data, not newly verified source counts.
  • License records include renewals and use license-term dates. Category/ward changes and administrative practice can affect counts; these are not business openings, closures or employment.
  • Business frequency screening compares adjacent 24-month windows, requiring 48 complete months. The 12-month comparison is context only. Fixed two-year windows reduce renewal-calendar mismatch; they are not seasonal adjustment, proof of a renewal mechanism, or a test of stability.
  • Window assessment: annual-only. Annual-only flags do not enter the frequency ranking. Opposite directions and short history must not be described as persistent changes.
  • Many dependent filter conditions were searched. No multiple-testing-adjusted significance or causal attribution is claimed.
  • Frequency compares fixed equal-length windows of raw counts, not population risk or a celeration-factor ratio. Reporting, classifications and exposure may have changed.
Phase diagnostics

Intervals assume fixed boundaries and independent log residuals. They are not adjusted for the phase or filter search. Near-optimal boundary ranges are not confidence intervals.

Saved phase results
PhaseStart–endMonthsFactor / six monthsConditional 95% intervalZeros fitted as 1Lag-one residual
1October 2016–September 2026120÷1.030.9552–0.993700.270
Exact monthly observations (120 slots)

Newest first. Unknown coverage is not a zero. These are the original saved observations, not fitted or rounded predictions.

Raw monthly license records
MonthRaw countCoverage
September 20269complete
August 20265complete
July 20265complete
June 20269complete
May 20265complete
April 20266complete
March 20264complete
February 20266complete
January 20268complete
December 202513complete
November 202513complete
October 202510complete
September 20257complete
August 202532complete
July 202511complete
June 202512complete
May 20258complete
April 202513complete
March 20258complete
February 20256complete
January 202516complete
December 202441complete
November 202412complete
October 202410complete
September 20247complete
August 20243complete
July 20246complete
June 20247complete
May 20246complete
April 20245complete
March 20247complete
February 20247complete
January 20246complete
December 202312complete
November 20239complete
October 202317complete
September 202311complete
August 202341complete
July 202312complete
June 202310complete
May 20239complete
April 202311complete
March 20239complete
February 20236complete
January 202315complete
December 202243complete
November 202214complete
October 20228complete
September 20229complete
August 20224complete
July 20226complete
June 20228complete
May 20227complete
April 20226complete
March 202211complete
February 20227complete
January 20227complete
December 202115complete
November 202114complete
October 202114complete
September 20219complete
August 202140complete
July 202117complete
June 202111complete
May 20219complete
April 202113complete
March 202110complete
February 20214complete
January 202117complete
December 202056complete
November 202015complete
October 20208complete
September 20206complete
August 20203complete
July 20207complete
June 20205complete
May 20209complete
April 20204complete
March 202011complete
February 20207complete
January 20208complete
December 201916complete
November 201913complete
October 201912complete
September 20198complete
August 201946complete
July 201913complete
June 201910complete
May 201912complete
April 201913complete
March 201912complete
February 20199complete
January 201919complete
December 201864complete
November 201813complete
October 201810complete
September 201810complete
August 20188complete
July 20186complete
June 20184complete
May 20188complete
April 20187complete
March 201814complete
February 20187complete
January 20186complete
December 201719complete
November 201712complete
October 201715complete
September 20177complete
August 201776complete
July 201712complete
June 201713complete
May 201716complete
April 201714complete
March 201712complete
February 201711complete
January 201724complete
December 201682complete
November 201614complete
October 20167complete
Source and reproducibility
Publisher dataset
Business Licenses · City of Chicago
Source retrieved
2026-11-05T21:09:58.696Z
Publisher update
2026-11-05T11:01:01.000Z
Covered months
October 2016–September 2026
Source note
Source xqx5-8hwx. Joint day/category/hour/applicable-flag/ward/status counts; no addresses, coordinates or incident identifiers. Each year's cells reconcile with an independent source total. Reads are not an atomic publisher snapshot. License records by term start, including renewals; not new businesses. Ward is as published, not reconstructed historical boundaries. Prepared daily community-area snapshot; scheduled rebuild at 06:00 America/Chicago. Full supported history is rechecked for corrections. Retrieval timestamps are preserved; this is not a real-time feed. Local indexed neighborhood snapshot. Totals are for the loaded area before other filters, not citywide totals. Citywide and unassigned-area views use a separate network-backed scope.
Snapshot
daily-v1:8a9771a7-dde2-4246-9cf6-d11519e895d6:neighborhood-v2:78d28669a6281fbcb274d9d86b92271f
Discovery method
multi-feed-turn-and-frequency-renewal-v2
Analyze method
exploratory-segmented-log10-ols-zero-as-one-v3
Search plan
a3ffccedeb8d8ce18a30df3636839f775af1e5188e55a1f685695133135c6e35
Evidence run
d6edf1dd0c0e5e884fd51cefc452961059fad4d11ebd7da7f286cfd27a54ac52

Challenge the pattern

Check unfiltered totals, comparable communities, source revisions and administrative definitions before treating this candidate as evidence of a real-world explanation. Only explicitly documented follow-ups above have been performed; no others are implied by the ranking. Browse the other business licenses candidates or review the complete screening method.