Generated evidence · pending editorial review

Irving Park: All categories · Ward: 33 — Business licenses

All categories · Ward: 33

City source retrieved November 5, 2026 · scan evaluated November 9, 2026 · Review context · not a qualifying candidate

Current dashboard records may have been revised. Analyze is a separate action there. Saved-for-review choices stay in this browser and do not endorse a result.

24-month frequency comparison

Annual-only flag · window-sensitive review context. The two-year comparison does not qualify for the frequency ranking. The annual evidence is retained below, not erased.

October 2022–September 2024
351
October 2024–September 2026
339
Change in monthly mean
-0.5

The two windows each contain 24 complete covered months. The magnitude of the change is 1.04-fold. These are published license records, not a population-adjusted rate. Fixed windows do not establish a breakpoint, remove all seasonal effects or prove a renewal explanation.

12-month comparison · context, not the business ranking

October 2024–September 2025
226
October 2025–September 2026
113
Change in monthly mean
-9.42

This annual comparison crosses the original screening gates. Two-year renewal schedules can put a pulse in one annual window and not the other. Opposing directions or threshold sensitivity can have other explanations; an annual-only label is not proof of a renewal cycle.

Saved observations and fitted phases

No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant.

Fixed six-log-cycle frame · 120 calendar months · factors per six months. Raw zeros stay zero; confirmed zeros become one only for log-space fitting and diagnostics. Missing coverage remains unavailable.

Monthly business license records on a standard celeration chartCity of Chicago published records. Fixed six-decade count scale, 120 calendar months, celeration per 6 months. Zero markers are unconnected below the plot. Exact counts and coverage are available in the data table. Analyze: suggested. No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant. See the phase results table for dates, factors and uncertainty.1510501005001,0005,00010,00050,000100,000500,0001,000,000License records per monthsuggested phase 1: 2016-10–2026-09Oct 2016: 9Nov 2016: 13Dec 2016: 144Jan 2017: 20Feb 2017: 13Mar 2017: 21Apr 2017: 23May 2017: 16Jun 2017: 9Jul 2017: 8Aug 2017: 15Sep 2017: 7Oct 2017: 11Nov 2017: 15Dec 2017: 11Jan 2018: 9Feb 2018: 12Mar 2018: 15Apr 2018: 11May 2018: 15Jun 2018: 19Jul 2018: 5Aug 2018: 9Sep 2018: 6Oct 2018: 16Nov 2018: 13Dec 2018: 124Jan 2019: 21Feb 2019: 10Mar 2019: 20Apr 2019: 19May 2019: 13Jun 2019: 6Jul 2019: 9Aug 2019: 7Sep 2019: 9Oct 2019: 10Nov 2019: 14Dec 2019: 20Jan 2020: 9Feb 2020: 7Mar 2020: 19Apr 2020: 3May 2020: 13Jun 2020: 10Jul 2020: 7Aug 2020: 7Sep 2020: 6Oct 2020: 10Nov 2020: 16Dec 2020: 116Jan 2021: 18Feb 2021: 13Mar 2021: 20Apr 2021: 18May 2021: 10Jun 2021: 12Jul 2021: 9Aug 2021: 11Sep 2021: 9Oct 2021: 9Nov 2021: 15Dec 2021: 21Jan 2022: 7Feb 2022: 8Mar 2022: 17Apr 2022: 4May 2022: 11Jun 2022: 11Jul 2022: 7Aug 2022: 7Sep 2022: 7Oct 2022: 7Nov 2022: 9Dec 2022: 102Jan 2023: 16Feb 2023: 13Mar 2023: 17Apr 2023: 17May 2023: 10Jun 2023: 15Jul 2023: 10Aug 2023: 10Sep 2023: 8Oct 2023: 9Nov 2023: 11Dec 2023: 24Jan 2024: 6Feb 2024: 5Mar 2024: 16Apr 2024: 5May 2024: 13Jun 2024: 6Jul 2024: 8Aug 2024: 9Sep 2024: 5Oct 2024: 7Nov 2024: 9Dec 2024: 94Jan 2025: 11Feb 2025: 11Mar 2025: 23Apr 2025: 18May 2025: 10Jun 2025: 15Jul 2025: 10Aug 2025: 10Sep 2025: 8Oct 2025: 10Nov 2025: 11Dec 2025: 21Jan 2026: 11Feb 2026: 5Mar 2026: 14Apr 2026: 6May 2026: 11Jun 2026: 6Jul 2026: 7Aug 2026: 5Sep 2026: 6ZeroUnknownOct 2016Oct 2017Oct 2018Oct 2019Oct 2020Oct 2021Oct 2022Oct 2023Oct 2024Oct 2025Oct 2026Calendar months

Suggested trend · exploratory · per six months

  1. 1 · Oct 2016–Sep 2026÷1.02Fitted decrease

Check the evidence

Interpretation and limitations (11)
  • Exploratory description, not a forecast, causal explanation or proof of a change.
  • Approximate 95% factor intervals assume independent, constant-variance log residuals and fixed boundaries. They do not account for boundary search, serial dependence or source revisions.
  • Confirmed zeros are treated as 1 only for fitting and its diagnostics. Raw counts stay zero; low-count results depend on this convention.
  • Independent phase lines may jump at boundaries. Every observation belongs to exactly one phase.
  • Reporting, classifications and seasonality can change. Counts are not population-adjusted; a level shift without a slope change is not the target of this search.
  • Uses dated last-good cached data, not newly verified source counts.
  • License records include renewals and use license-term dates. Category/ward changes and administrative practice can affect counts; these are not business openings, closures or employment.
  • Business frequency screening compares adjacent 24-month windows, requiring 48 complete months. The 12-month comparison is context only. Fixed two-year windows reduce renewal-calendar mismatch; they are not seasonal adjustment, proof of a renewal mechanism, or a test of stability.
  • Window assessment: annual-only. Annual-only flags do not enter the frequency ranking. Opposite directions and short history must not be described as persistent changes.
  • Many dependent filter conditions were searched. No multiple-testing-adjusted significance or causal attribution is claimed.
  • Frequency compares fixed equal-length windows of raw counts, not population risk or a celeration-factor ratio. Reporting, classifications and exposure may have changed.
Phase diagnostics

Intervals assume fixed boundaries and independent log residuals. They are not adjusted for the phase or filter search. Near-optimal boundary ranges are not confidence intervals.

Saved phase results
PhaseStart–endMonthsFactor / six monthsConditional 95% intervalZeros fitted as 1Lag-one residual
1October 2016–September 2026120÷1.020.9585–0.998400.131
Exact monthly observations (120 slots)

Newest first. Unknown coverage is not a zero. These are the original saved observations, not fitted or rounded predictions.

Raw monthly license records
MonthRaw countCoverage
September 20266complete
August 20265complete
July 20267complete
June 20266complete
May 202611complete
April 20266complete
March 202614complete
February 20265complete
January 202611complete
December 202521complete
November 202511complete
October 202510complete
September 20258complete
August 202510complete
July 202510complete
June 202515complete
May 202510complete
April 202518complete
March 202523complete
February 202511complete
January 202511complete
December 202494complete
November 20249complete
October 20247complete
September 20245complete
August 20249complete
July 20248complete
June 20246complete
May 202413complete
April 20245complete
March 202416complete
February 20245complete
January 20246complete
December 202324complete
November 202311complete
October 20239complete
September 20238complete
August 202310complete
July 202310complete
June 202315complete
May 202310complete
April 202317complete
March 202317complete
February 202313complete
January 202316complete
December 2022102complete
November 20229complete
October 20227complete
September 20227complete
August 20227complete
July 20227complete
June 202211complete
May 202211complete
April 20224complete
March 202217complete
February 20228complete
January 20227complete
December 202121complete
November 202115complete
October 20219complete
September 20219complete
August 202111complete
July 20219complete
June 202112complete
May 202110complete
April 202118complete
March 202120complete
February 202113complete
January 202118complete
December 2020116complete
November 202016complete
October 202010complete
September 20206complete
August 20207complete
July 20207complete
June 202010complete
May 202013complete
April 20203complete
March 202019complete
February 20207complete
January 20209complete
December 201920complete
November 201914complete
October 201910complete
September 20199complete
August 20197complete
July 20199complete
June 20196complete
May 201913complete
April 201919complete
March 201920complete
February 201910complete
January 201921complete
December 2018124complete
November 201813complete
October 201816complete
September 20186complete
August 20189complete
July 20185complete
June 201819complete
May 201815complete
April 201811complete
March 201815complete
February 201812complete
January 20189complete
December 201711complete
November 201715complete
October 201711complete
September 20177complete
August 201715complete
July 20178complete
June 20179complete
May 201716complete
April 201723complete
March 201721complete
February 201713complete
January 201720complete
December 2016144complete
November 201613complete
October 20169complete
Source and reproducibility
Publisher dataset
Business Licenses · City of Chicago
Source retrieved
2026-11-05T21:09:58.696Z
Publisher update
2026-11-05T11:01:01.000Z
Covered months
October 2016–September 2026
Source note
Source xqx5-8hwx. Joint day/category/hour/applicable-flag/ward/status counts; no addresses, coordinates or incident identifiers. Each year's cells reconcile with an independent source total. Reads are not an atomic publisher snapshot. License records by term start, including renewals; not new businesses. Ward is as published, not reconstructed historical boundaries. Prepared daily community-area snapshot; scheduled rebuild at 06:00 America/Chicago. Full supported history is rechecked for corrections. Retrieval timestamps are preserved; this is not a real-time feed. Local indexed neighborhood snapshot. Totals are for the loaded area before other filters, not citywide totals. Citywide and unassigned-area views use a separate network-backed scope.
Snapshot
daily-v1:8a9771a7-dde2-4246-9cf6-d11519e895d6:neighborhood-v2:78d28669a6281fbcb274d9d86b92271f
Discovery method
multi-feed-turn-and-frequency-renewal-v2
Analyze method
exploratory-segmented-log10-ols-zero-as-one-v3
Search plan
a3ffccedeb8d8ce18a30df3636839f775af1e5188e55a1f685695133135c6e35
Evidence run
d6edf1dd0c0e5e884fd51cefc452961059fad4d11ebd7da7f286cfd27a54ac52

Challenge the pattern

Check unfiltered totals, comparable communities, source revisions and administrative definitions before treating this candidate as evidence of a real-world explanation. Only explicitly documented follow-ups above have been performed; no others are implied by the ranking. Browse the other business licenses candidates or review the complete screening method.