Generated evidence · pending editorial review

Hermosa: All categories · Ward: 31 — Business licenses

All categories · Ward: 31

City source retrieved November 5, 2026 · scan evaluated November 9, 2026 · Review context · not a qualifying candidate

Current dashboard records may have been revised. Analyze is a separate action there. Saved-for-review choices stay in this browser and do not endorse a result.

24-month frequency comparison

Annual-only flag · window-sensitive review context. The two-year comparison does not qualify for the frequency ranking. The annual evidence is retained below, not erased.

October 2022–September 2024
243
October 2024–September 2026
213
Change in monthly mean
-1.25

The two windows each contain 24 complete covered months. The magnitude of the change is 1.14-fold. These are published license records, not a population-adjusted rate. Fixed windows do not establish a breakpoint, remove all seasonal effects or prove a renewal explanation.

12-month comparison · context, not the business ranking

October 2024–September 2025
139
October 2025–September 2026
74
Change in monthly mean
-5.42

This annual comparison crosses the original screening gates. Two-year renewal schedules can put a pulse in one annual window and not the other. Opposing directions or threshold sensitivity can have other explanations; an annual-only label is not proof of a renewal cycle.

Saved observations and fitted phases

No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant.

Fixed six-log-cycle frame · 120 calendar months · factors per six months. Raw zeros stay zero; confirmed zeros become one only for log-space fitting and diagnostics. Missing coverage remains unavailable.

Monthly business license records on a standard celeration chartCity of Chicago published records. Fixed six-decade count scale, 120 calendar months, celeration per 6 months. Zero markers are unconnected below the plot. Exact counts and coverage are available in the data table. Analyze: suggested. No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant. See the phase results table for dates, factors and uncertainty.1510501005001,0005,00010,00050,000100,000500,0001,000,000License records per monthsuggested phase 1: 2016-10–2026-09Oct 2016: 4Nov 2016: 3Dec 2016: 3Jan 2017: 92Feb 2017: 12Mar 2017: 13Apr 2017: 4May 2017: 5Jun 2017: 10Jul 2017: 12Aug 2017: 16Sep 2017: 5Oct 2017: 6Nov 2017: 8Dec 2017: 3Jan 2018: 4Feb 2018: 8Mar 2018: 5Apr 2018: 6May 2018: 6Jun 2018: 10Jul 2018: 3Aug 2018: 4Sep 2018: 9Oct 2018: 3Nov 2018: 6Dec 2018: 4Jan 2019: 83Feb 2019: 12Mar 2019: 6Apr 2019: 9May 2019: 10Jun 2019: 5Jul 2019: 10Aug 2019: 17Sep 2019: 4Oct 2019: 13Nov 2019: 5Dec 2019: 3Jan 2020: 8Feb 2020: 9Mar 2020: 5Apr 2020: 4May 2020: 3Jun 2020: 6Jul 2020: 5Aug 2020: 5Sep 2020: 7Oct 2020: 7Nov 2020: 6Dec 2020: 7Jan 2021: 76Feb 2021: 13Mar 2021: 6Apr 2021: 6May 2021: 8Jun 2021: 6Jul 2021: 6Aug 2021: 18Sep 2021: 5Oct 2021: 8Nov 2021: 6Dec 2021: 3Jan 2022: 7Feb 2022: 8Mar 2022: 8Apr 2022: 6May 2022: 7Jun 2022: 7Jul 2022: 4Aug 2022: 6Sep 2022: 6Oct 2022: 6Nov 2022: 7Dec 2022: 6Jan 2023: 64Feb 2023: 16Mar 2023: 3Apr 2023: 9May 2023: 11Jun 2023: 11Jul 2023: 5Aug 2023: 17Sep 2023: 5Oct 2023: 12Nov 2023: 3Dec 2023: 2Jan 2024: 8Feb 2024: 8Mar 2024: 7Apr 2024: 3May 2024: 11Jun 2024: 7Jul 2024: 8Aug 2024: 7Sep 2024: 7Oct 2024: 9Nov 2024: 7Dec 2024: 9Jan 2025: 43Feb 2025: 13Mar 2025: 6Apr 2025: 5May 2025: 9Jun 2025: 7Jul 2025: 10Aug 2025: 16Sep 2025: 5Oct 2025: 9Nov 2025: 4Dec 2025: 4Jan 2026: 4Feb 2026: 7Mar 2026: 8Apr 2026: 7May 2026: 7Jun 2026: 7Jul 2026: 4Aug 2026: 10Sep 2026: 3ZeroUnknownOct 2016Oct 2017Oct 2018Oct 2019Oct 2020Oct 2021Oct 2022Oct 2023Oct 2024Oct 2025Oct 2026Calendar months

Suggested trend · exploratory · per six months

  1. 1 · Oct 2016–Sep 2026÷1.00Direction uncertain

Check the evidence

Interpretation and limitations (12)
  • Exploratory description, not a forecast, causal explanation or proof of a change.
  • Approximate 95% factor intervals assume independent, constant-variance log residuals and fixed boundaries. They do not account for boundary search, serial dependence or source revisions.
  • Confirmed zeros are treated as 1 only for fitting and its diagnostics. Raw counts stay zero; low-count results depend on this convention.
  • Independent phase lines may jump at boundaries. Every observation belongs to exactly one phase.
  • Reporting, classifications and seasonality can change. Counts are not population-adjusted; a level shift without a slope change is not the target of this search.
  • Uses dated last-good cached data, not newly verified source counts.
  • At least one factor interval includes 1; its direction is uncertain under this approximation.
  • License records include renewals and use license-term dates. Category/ward changes and administrative practice can affect counts; these are not business openings, closures or employment.
  • Business frequency screening compares adjacent 24-month windows, requiring 48 complete months. The 12-month comparison is context only. Fixed two-year windows reduce renewal-calendar mismatch; they are not seasonal adjustment, proof of a renewal mechanism, or a test of stability.
  • Window assessment: annual-only. Annual-only flags do not enter the frequency ranking. Opposite directions and short history must not be described as persistent changes.
  • Many dependent filter conditions were searched. No multiple-testing-adjusted significance or causal attribution is claimed.
  • Frequency compares fixed equal-length windows of raw counts, not population risk or a celeration-factor ratio. Reporting, classifications and exposure may have changed.
Phase diagnostics

Intervals assume fixed boundaries and independent log residuals. They are not adjusted for the phase or filter search. Near-optimal boundary ranges are not confidence intervals.

Saved phase results
PhaseStart–endMonthsFactor / six monthsConditional 95% intervalZeros fitted as 1Lag-one residual
1October 2016–September 2026120÷10.9787–1.02100.069
Exact monthly observations (120 slots)

Newest first. Unknown coverage is not a zero. These are the original saved observations, not fitted or rounded predictions.

Raw monthly license records
MonthRaw countCoverage
September 20263complete
August 202610complete
July 20264complete
June 20267complete
May 20267complete
April 20267complete
March 20268complete
February 20267complete
January 20264complete
December 20254complete
November 20254complete
October 20259complete
September 20255complete
August 202516complete
July 202510complete
June 20257complete
May 20259complete
April 20255complete
March 20256complete
February 202513complete
January 202543complete
December 20249complete
November 20247complete
October 20249complete
September 20247complete
August 20247complete
July 20248complete
June 20247complete
May 202411complete
April 20243complete
March 20247complete
February 20248complete
January 20248complete
December 20232complete
November 20233complete
October 202312complete
September 20235complete
August 202317complete
July 20235complete
June 202311complete
May 202311complete
April 20239complete
March 20233complete
February 202316complete
January 202364complete
December 20226complete
November 20227complete
October 20226complete
September 20226complete
August 20226complete
July 20224complete
June 20227complete
May 20227complete
April 20226complete
March 20228complete
February 20228complete
January 20227complete
December 20213complete
November 20216complete
October 20218complete
September 20215complete
August 202118complete
July 20216complete
June 20216complete
May 20218complete
April 20216complete
March 20216complete
February 202113complete
January 202176complete
December 20207complete
November 20206complete
October 20207complete
September 20207complete
August 20205complete
July 20205complete
June 20206complete
May 20203complete
April 20204complete
March 20205complete
February 20209complete
January 20208complete
December 20193complete
November 20195complete
October 201913complete
September 20194complete
August 201917complete
July 201910complete
June 20195complete
May 201910complete
April 20199complete
March 20196complete
February 201912complete
January 201983complete
December 20184complete
November 20186complete
October 20183complete
September 20189complete
August 20184complete
July 20183complete
June 201810complete
May 20186complete
April 20186complete
March 20185complete
February 20188complete
January 20184complete
December 20173complete
November 20178complete
October 20176complete
September 20175complete
August 201716complete
July 201712complete
June 201710complete
May 20175complete
April 20174complete
March 201713complete
February 201712complete
January 201792complete
December 20163complete
November 20163complete
October 20164complete
Source and reproducibility
Publisher dataset
Business Licenses · City of Chicago
Source retrieved
2026-11-05T21:09:58.696Z
Publisher update
2026-11-05T11:01:01.000Z
Covered months
October 2016–September 2026
Source note
Source xqx5-8hwx. Joint day/category/hour/applicable-flag/ward/status counts; no addresses, coordinates or incident identifiers. Each year's cells reconcile with an independent source total. Reads are not an atomic publisher snapshot. License records by term start, including renewals; not new businesses. Ward is as published, not reconstructed historical boundaries. Prepared daily community-area snapshot; scheduled rebuild at 06:00 America/Chicago. Full supported history is rechecked for corrections. Retrieval timestamps are preserved; this is not a real-time feed. Local indexed neighborhood snapshot. Totals are for the loaded area before other filters, not citywide totals. Citywide and unassigned-area views use a separate network-backed scope.
Snapshot
daily-v1:8a9771a7-dde2-4246-9cf6-d11519e895d6:neighborhood-v2:71b680a985844695a30723cf6de65543
Discovery method
multi-feed-turn-and-frequency-renewal-v2
Analyze method
exploratory-segmented-log10-ols-zero-as-one-v3
Search plan
a3ffccedeb8d8ce18a30df3636839f775af1e5188e55a1f685695133135c6e35
Evidence run
f13e4d48ecea40272093b2679123613331cb754e46d828ba5218d23b90310c16

Challenge the pattern

Check unfiltered totals, comparable communities, source revisions and administrative definitions before treating this candidate as evidence of a real-world explanation. Only explicitly documented follow-ups above have been performed; no others are implied by the ranking. Browse the other business licenses candidates or review the complete screening method.