Generated evidence · pending editorial review

Edison Park: All categories — Business licenses

All categories · all other available filters

City source retrieved November 5, 2026 · scan evaluated November 9, 2026 · Review context · not a qualifying candidate

Current dashboard records may have been revised. Analyze is a separate action there. Saved-for-review choices stay in this browser and do not endorse a result.

24-month frequency comparison

Annual-only flag · window-sensitive review context. The two-year comparison does not qualify for the frequency ranking. The annual evidence is retained below, not erased.

October 2022–September 2024
177
October 2024–September 2026
181
Change in monthly mean
+0.17

The two windows each contain 24 complete covered months. The magnitude of the change is 1.02-fold. These are published license records, not a population-adjusted rate. Fixed windows do not establish a breakpoint, remove all seasonal effects or prove a renewal explanation.

12-month comparison · context, not the business ranking

October 2024–September 2025
60
October 2025–September 2026
121
Change in monthly mean
5.08

This annual comparison crosses the original screening gates. Two-year renewal schedules can put a pulse in one annual window and not the other. Opposing directions or threshold sensitivity can have other explanations; an annual-only label is not proof of a renewal cycle.

Saved observations and fitted phases

No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant.

Fixed six-log-cycle frame · 120 calendar months · factors per six months. Raw zeros stay zero; confirmed zeros become one only for log-space fitting and diagnostics. Missing coverage remains unavailable.

Monthly business license records on a standard celeration chartCity of Chicago published records. Fixed six-decade count scale, 120 calendar months, celeration per 6 months. Zero markers are unconnected below the plot. Exact counts and coverage are available in the data table. Analyze: suggested. No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant. See the phase results table for dates, factors and uncertainty.1510501005001,0005,00010,00050,000100,000500,0001,000,000License records per monthsuggested phase 1: 2016-10–2026-09Oct 2016: 7Nov 2016: 6Dec 2016: 1Jan 2017: 9Feb 2017: 8Mar 2017: 1Apr 2017: 8May 2017: 5Jun 2017: 5Jul 2017: 10Aug 2017: 13Sep 2017: 3Oct 2017: 6Nov 2017: 4Dec 2017: 4Jan 2018: 6Feb 2018: 2Mar 2018: 3Apr 2018: 3May 2018: 3Jun 2018: 8Jul 2018: 6Aug 2018: 96Sep 2018: 7Oct 2018: 4Nov 2018: 8Dec 2018: 1Jan 2019: 5Feb 2019: 6Mar 2019: 6Apr 2019: 9May 2019: 1Jun 2019: 2Jul 2019: 12Aug 2019: 7Sep 2019: 4Oct 2019: 3Nov 2019: 8Dec 2019: 6Jan 2020: 7Feb 2020: 2Mar 2020: 5Apr 2020: 4May 2020: 3Jun 2020: 13Jul 2020: 2Aug 2020: 80Sep 2020: 3Oct 2020: 6Nov 2020: 8Dec 2020: 5Jan 2021: 10Feb 2021: 6Mar 2021: 5Apr 2021: 9May 2021: 12Jun 2021: 3Jul 2021: 5Aug 2021: 10Sep 2021: 7Oct 2021: 4Nov 2021: 5Dec 2021: 6Jan 2022: 7Feb 2022: 3Mar 2022: 4Apr 2022: 6May 2022: 4Jun 2022: 5Jul 2022: 10Aug 2022: 70Sep 2022: 8Oct 2022: 6Nov 2022: 5Dec 2022: 2Jan 2023: 6Feb 2023: 6Mar 2023: 3Apr 2023: 5May 2023: 4Jun 2023: 6Jul 2023: 5Aug 2023: 9Sep 2023: 3Oct 2023: 4Nov 2023: 3Dec 2023: 5Jan 2024: 8Mar 2024: 6Apr 2024: 7May 2024: 2Jun 2024: 6Jul 2024: 9Aug 2024: 63Sep 2024: 4Oct 2024: 10Nov 2024: 3Dec 2024: 2Jan 2025: 5Feb 2025: 7Mar 2025: 3Apr 2025: 6May 2025: 3Jun 2025: 6Jul 2025: 4Aug 2025: 6Sep 2025: 5Oct 2025: 7Nov 2025: 6Dec 2025: 10Jan 2026: 9Feb 2026: 2Mar 2026: 5Apr 2026: 8May 2026: 3Jun 2026: 8Jul 2026: 3Aug 2026: 54Sep 2026: 6ZeroUnknownFeb 2024: zero license records; not connectedOct 2016Oct 2017Oct 2018Oct 2019Oct 2020Oct 2021Oct 2022Oct 2023Oct 2024Oct 2025Oct 2026Calendar months

Suggested trend · exploratory · per six months

  1. 1 · Oct 2016–Sep 2026×1.01Direction uncertain · 1 zero fitted as 1

Check the evidence

Interpretation and limitations (13)
  • Exploratory description, not a forecast, causal explanation or proof of a change.
  • Approximate 95% factor intervals assume independent, constant-variance log residuals and fixed boundaries. They do not account for boundary search, serial dependence or source revisions.
  • Confirmed zeros are treated as 1 only for fitting and its diagnostics. Raw counts stay zero; low-count results depend on this convention.
  • Independent phase lines may jump at boundaries. Every observation belongs to exactly one phase.
  • Reporting, classifications and seasonality can change. Counts are not population-adjusted; a level shift without a slope change is not the target of this search.
  • Uses dated last-good cached data, not newly verified source counts.
  • 1 confirmed zero fitted as 1; raw counts remain zero. Low-count trends are sensitive to this adjustment.
  • At least one factor interval includes 1; its direction is uncertain under this approximation.
  • License records include renewals and use license-term dates. Category/ward changes and administrative practice can affect counts; these are not business openings, closures or employment.
  • Business frequency screening compares adjacent 24-month windows, requiring 48 complete months. The 12-month comparison is context only. Fixed two-year windows reduce renewal-calendar mismatch; they are not seasonal adjustment, proof of a renewal mechanism, or a test of stability.
  • Window assessment: annual-only. Annual-only flags do not enter the frequency ranking. Opposite directions and short history must not be described as persistent changes.
  • Many dependent filter conditions were searched. No multiple-testing-adjusted significance or causal attribution is claimed.
  • Frequency compares fixed equal-length windows of raw counts, not population risk or a celeration-factor ratio. Reporting, classifications and exposure may have changed.
Phase diagnostics

Intervals assume fixed boundaries and independent log residuals. They are not adjusted for the phase or filter search. Near-optimal boundary ranges are not confidence intervals.

Saved phase results
PhaseStart–endMonthsFactor / six monthsConditional 95% intervalZeros fitted as 1Lag-one residual
1October 2016–September 2026120×1.010.9834–1.0341-0.097
Exact monthly observations (120 slots)

Newest first. Unknown coverage is not a zero. These are the original saved observations, not fitted or rounded predictions.

Raw monthly license records
MonthRaw countCoverage
September 20266complete
August 202654complete
July 20263complete
June 20268complete
May 20263complete
April 20268complete
March 20265complete
February 20262complete
January 20269complete
December 202510complete
November 20256complete
October 20257complete
September 20255complete
August 20256complete
July 20254complete
June 20256complete
May 20253complete
April 20256complete
March 20253complete
February 20257complete
January 20255complete
December 20242complete
November 20243complete
October 202410complete
September 20244complete
August 202463complete
July 20249complete
June 20246complete
May 20242complete
April 20247complete
March 20246complete
February 20240complete
January 20248complete
December 20235complete
November 20233complete
October 20234complete
September 20233complete
August 20239complete
July 20235complete
June 20236complete
May 20234complete
April 20235complete
March 20233complete
February 20236complete
January 20236complete
December 20222complete
November 20225complete
October 20226complete
September 20228complete
August 202270complete
July 202210complete
June 20225complete
May 20224complete
April 20226complete
March 20224complete
February 20223complete
January 20227complete
December 20216complete
November 20215complete
October 20214complete
September 20217complete
August 202110complete
July 20215complete
June 20213complete
May 202112complete
April 20219complete
March 20215complete
February 20216complete
January 202110complete
December 20205complete
November 20208complete
October 20206complete
September 20203complete
August 202080complete
July 20202complete
June 202013complete
May 20203complete
April 20204complete
March 20205complete
February 20202complete
January 20207complete
December 20196complete
November 20198complete
October 20193complete
September 20194complete
August 20197complete
July 201912complete
June 20192complete
May 20191complete
April 20199complete
March 20196complete
February 20196complete
January 20195complete
December 20181complete
November 20188complete
October 20184complete
September 20187complete
August 201896complete
July 20186complete
June 20188complete
May 20183complete
April 20183complete
March 20183complete
February 20182complete
January 20186complete
December 20174complete
November 20174complete
October 20176complete
September 20173complete
August 201713complete
July 201710complete
June 20175complete
May 20175complete
April 20178complete
March 20171complete
February 20178complete
January 20179complete
December 20161complete
November 20166complete
October 20167complete
Source and reproducibility
Publisher dataset
Business Licenses · City of Chicago
Source retrieved
2026-11-05T21:09:58.696Z
Publisher update
2026-11-05T11:01:01.000Z
Covered months
October 2016–September 2026
Source note
Source xqx5-8hwx. Joint day/category/hour/applicable-flag/ward/status counts; no addresses, coordinates or incident identifiers. Each year's cells reconcile with an independent source total. Reads are not an atomic publisher snapshot. License records by term start, including renewals; not new businesses. Ward is as published, not reconstructed historical boundaries. Prepared daily community-area snapshot; scheduled rebuild at 06:00 America/Chicago. Full supported history is rechecked for corrections. Retrieval timestamps are preserved; this is not a real-time feed. Local indexed neighborhood snapshot. Totals are for the loaded area before other filters, not citywide totals. Citywide and unassigned-area views use a separate network-backed scope.
Snapshot
daily-v1:8a9771a7-dde2-4246-9cf6-d11519e895d6:neighborhood-v2:186001eafb8e8a1d2ccb2081c5bfbd53
Discovery method
multi-feed-turn-and-frequency-renewal-v2
Analyze method
exploratory-segmented-log10-ols-zero-as-one-v3
Search plan
a3ffccedeb8d8ce18a30df3636839f775af1e5188e55a1f685695133135c6e35
Evidence run
b2a21d06a1d7c5af5c44c46f05c5e87642732e3a6229e5ac2bf08305a868b6ab

Challenge the pattern

Check unfiltered totals, comparable communities, source revisions and administrative definitions before treating this candidate as evidence of a real-world explanation. Only explicitly documented follow-ups above have been performed; no others are implied by the ranking. Browse the other business licenses candidates or review the complete screening method.