Generated evidence · pending editorial review

Clearing: All categories · Ward: 13 — Business licenses

All categories · Ward: 13

City source retrieved November 5, 2026 · scan evaluated November 9, 2026 · Review context · not a qualifying candidate

Current dashboard records may have been revised. Analyze is a separate action there. Saved-for-review choices stay in this browser and do not endorse a result.

24-month frequency comparison

Annual-only flag · window-sensitive review context. The two-year comparison does not qualify for the frequency ranking. The annual evidence is retained below, not erased.

October 2022–September 2024
298
October 2024–September 2026
286
Change in monthly mean
-0.5

The two windows each contain 24 complete covered months. The magnitude of the change is 1.04-fold. These are published license records, not a population-adjusted rate. Fixed windows do not establish a breakpoint, remove all seasonal effects or prove a renewal explanation.

12-month comparison · context, not the business ranking

October 2024–September 2025
88
October 2025–September 2026
198
Change in monthly mean
9.17

This annual comparison crosses the original screening gates. Two-year renewal schedules can put a pulse in one annual window and not the other. Opposing directions or threshold sensitivity can have other explanations; an annual-only label is not proof of a renewal cycle.

Saved observations and fitted phases

No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant.

Fixed six-log-cycle frame · 120 calendar months · factors per six months. Raw zeros stay zero; confirmed zeros become one only for log-space fitting and diagnostics. Missing coverage remains unavailable.

Monthly business license records on a standard celeration chartCity of Chicago published records. Fixed six-decade count scale, 120 calendar months, celeration per 6 months. Zero markers are unconnected below the plot. Exact counts and coverage are available in the data table. Analyze: suggested. No clear change in celeration under this rule. This does not mean counts were constant. See the phase results table for dates, factors and uncertainty.1510501005001,0005,00010,00050,000100,000500,0001,000,000License records per monthsuggested phase 1: 2016-10–2026-09Oct 2016: 3Nov 2016: 3Dec 2016: 5Jan 2017: 9Feb 2017: 6Mar 2017: 9Apr 2017: 7May 2017: 7Jun 2017: 8Jul 2017: 9Aug 2017: 3Sep 2017: 6Oct 2017: 26Nov 2017: 5Dec 2017: 12Jan 2018: 126Feb 2018: 7Mar 2018: 9Apr 2018: 5May 2018: 10Jun 2018: 15Jul 2018: 6Aug 2018: 12Sep 2018: 6Oct 2018: 10Nov 2018: 3Dec 2018: 2Jan 2019: 6Feb 2019: 6Mar 2019: 12Apr 2019: 7May 2019: 10Jun 2019: 9Jul 2019: 6Aug 2019: 3Sep 2019: 5Oct 2019: 21Nov 2019: 7Dec 2019: 12Jan 2020: 116Feb 2020: 8Mar 2020: 10Apr 2020: 6May 2020: 10Jun 2020: 7Jul 2020: 8Aug 2020: 8Sep 2020: 3Oct 2020: 11Nov 2020: 5Dec 2020: 5Jan 2021: 11Feb 2021: 6Mar 2021: 10Apr 2021: 7May 2021: 7Jun 2021: 9Jul 2021: 6Aug 2021: 4Sep 2021: 8Oct 2021: 24Nov 2021: 8Dec 2021: 11Jan 2022: 103Feb 2022: 11Mar 2022: 6Apr 2022: 7May 2022: 13Jun 2022: 8Jul 2022: 7Aug 2022: 9Sep 2022: 3Oct 2022: 10Nov 2022: 6Dec 2022: 3Jan 2023: 11Feb 2023: 5Mar 2023: 8Apr 2023: 8May 2023: 8Jun 2023: 13Jul 2023: 12Aug 2023: 6Sep 2023: 5Oct 2023: 24Nov 2023: 8Dec 2023: 9Jan 2024: 87Feb 2024: 9Mar 2024: 8Apr 2024: 11May 2024: 20Jun 2024: 12Jul 2024: 5Aug 2024: 7Sep 2024: 3Oct 2024: 7Nov 2024: 8Dec 2024: 4Jan 2025: 12Feb 2025: 5Mar 2025: 8Apr 2025: 8May 2025: 8Jun 2025: 7Jul 2025: 10Aug 2025: 6Sep 2025: 5Oct 2025: 23Nov 2025: 11Dec 2025: 8Jan 2026: 80Feb 2026: 11Mar 2026: 15Apr 2026: 7May 2026: 14Jun 2026: 13Jul 2026: 7Aug 2026: 7Sep 2026: 2ZeroUnknownOct 2016Oct 2017Oct 2018Oct 2019Oct 2020Oct 2021Oct 2022Oct 2023Oct 2024Oct 2025Oct 2026Calendar months

Suggested trend · exploratory · per six months

  1. 1 · Oct 2016–Sep 2026×1.01Direction uncertain

Check the evidence

Interpretation and limitations (12)
  • Exploratory description, not a forecast, causal explanation or proof of a change.
  • Approximate 95% factor intervals assume independent, constant-variance log residuals and fixed boundaries. They do not account for boundary search, serial dependence or source revisions.
  • Confirmed zeros are treated as 1 only for fitting and its diagnostics. Raw counts stay zero; low-count results depend on this convention.
  • Independent phase lines may jump at boundaries. Every observation belongs to exactly one phase.
  • Reporting, classifications and seasonality can change. Counts are not population-adjusted; a level shift without a slope change is not the target of this search.
  • Uses dated last-good cached data, not newly verified source counts.
  • At least one factor interval includes 1; its direction is uncertain under this approximation.
  • License records include renewals and use license-term dates. Category/ward changes and administrative practice can affect counts; these are not business openings, closures or employment.
  • Business frequency screening compares adjacent 24-month windows, requiring 48 complete months. The 12-month comparison is context only. Fixed two-year windows reduce renewal-calendar mismatch; they are not seasonal adjustment, proof of a renewal mechanism, or a test of stability.
  • Window assessment: annual-only. Annual-only flags do not enter the frequency ranking. Opposite directions and short history must not be described as persistent changes.
  • Many dependent filter conditions were searched. No multiple-testing-adjusted significance or causal attribution is claimed.
  • Frequency compares fixed equal-length windows of raw counts, not population risk or a celeration-factor ratio. Reporting, classifications and exposure may have changed.
Phase diagnostics

Intervals assume fixed boundaries and independent log residuals. They are not adjusted for the phase or filter search. Near-optimal boundary ranges are not confidence intervals.

Saved phase results
PhaseStart–endMonthsFactor / six monthsConditional 95% intervalZeros fitted as 1Lag-one residual
1October 2016–September 2026120×1.010.9891–1.03600.069
Exact monthly observations (120 slots)

Newest first. Unknown coverage is not a zero. These are the original saved observations, not fitted or rounded predictions.

Raw monthly license records
MonthRaw countCoverage
September 20262complete
August 20267complete
July 20267complete
June 202613complete
May 202614complete
April 20267complete
March 202615complete
February 202611complete
January 202680complete
December 20258complete
November 202511complete
October 202523complete
September 20255complete
August 20256complete
July 202510complete
June 20257complete
May 20258complete
April 20258complete
March 20258complete
February 20255complete
January 202512complete
December 20244complete
November 20248complete
October 20247complete
September 20243complete
August 20247complete
July 20245complete
June 202412complete
May 202420complete
April 202411complete
March 20248complete
February 20249complete
January 202487complete
December 20239complete
November 20238complete
October 202324complete
September 20235complete
August 20236complete
July 202312complete
June 202313complete
May 20238complete
April 20238complete
March 20238complete
February 20235complete
January 202311complete
December 20223complete
November 20226complete
October 202210complete
September 20223complete
August 20229complete
July 20227complete
June 20228complete
May 202213complete
April 20227complete
March 20226complete
February 202211complete
January 2022103complete
December 202111complete
November 20218complete
October 202124complete
September 20218complete
August 20214complete
July 20216complete
June 20219complete
May 20217complete
April 20217complete
March 202110complete
February 20216complete
January 202111complete
December 20205complete
November 20205complete
October 202011complete
September 20203complete
August 20208complete
July 20208complete
June 20207complete
May 202010complete
April 20206complete
March 202010complete
February 20208complete
January 2020116complete
December 201912complete
November 20197complete
October 201921complete
September 20195complete
August 20193complete
July 20196complete
June 20199complete
May 201910complete
April 20197complete
March 201912complete
February 20196complete
January 20196complete
December 20182complete
November 20183complete
October 201810complete
September 20186complete
August 201812complete
July 20186complete
June 201815complete
May 201810complete
April 20185complete
March 20189complete
February 20187complete
January 2018126complete
December 201712complete
November 20175complete
October 201726complete
September 20176complete
August 20173complete
July 20179complete
June 20178complete
May 20177complete
April 20177complete
March 20179complete
February 20176complete
January 20179complete
December 20165complete
November 20163complete
October 20163complete
Source and reproducibility
Publisher dataset
Business Licenses · City of Chicago
Source retrieved
2026-11-05T21:09:58.696Z
Publisher update
2026-11-05T11:01:01.000Z
Covered months
October 2016–September 2026
Source note
Source xqx5-8hwx. Joint day/category/hour/applicable-flag/ward/status counts; no addresses, coordinates or incident identifiers. Each year's cells reconcile with an independent source total. Reads are not an atomic publisher snapshot. License records by term start, including renewals; not new businesses. Ward is as published, not reconstructed historical boundaries. Prepared daily community-area snapshot; scheduled rebuild at 06:00 America/Chicago. Full supported history is rechecked for corrections. Retrieval timestamps are preserved; this is not a real-time feed. Local indexed neighborhood snapshot. Totals are for the loaded area before other filters, not citywide totals. Citywide and unassigned-area views use a separate network-backed scope.
Snapshot
daily-v1:8a9771a7-dde2-4246-9cf6-d11519e895d6:neighborhood-v2:542e7e918dd1b5447d1ce6425ae7bc26
Discovery method
multi-feed-turn-and-frequency-renewal-v2
Analyze method
exploratory-segmented-log10-ols-zero-as-one-v3
Search plan
a3ffccedeb8d8ce18a30df3636839f775af1e5188e55a1f685695133135c6e35
Evidence run
4913ebbb9f5b8f8d79aa3f8ddae0f1855a9c5eac4c6eee630f70b4016832955c

Challenge the pattern

Check unfiltered totals, comparable communities, source revisions and administrative definitions before treating this candidate as evidence of a real-world explanation. Only explicitly documented follow-ups above have been performed; no others are implied by the ranking. Browse the other business licenses candidates or review the complete screening method.